If you want people to take your message seriously why don't you learn some basic diplomacy skills??? Starting off your comment by insinuating that my main point is that people "make income" is shallow (on your end) and simply incorrect. Therefore, I am NOT going to check out the links you have IMPOSED on my post through your comments. I would SURELY had look at them if you had exercised some grace in the wording of your comment. Perhaps you should RE-READ my post and REALLY ask yourself if my MAIN focus is on people "earning income" OR if it is an examination of the nature and power of the commenting feature on this platform. I think if you approach this post WITHOUT your highly emotive assumptions you may very well gain some "priceless" knowledge. Just something to think about.Good luck...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Wow. Humble apologies for tripping Your switch. I merely mentioned that I was not here for that purpose. I am here to help Humanity, and if that does not interest You, You are welcome to pass on My efforts. I wish You a wonderful life and will move on.
What's with all the drama? This is a helpful post about a valuable topic. As you surely know, there is ENOUGH drama in the world right now. Why add more? Time to focus on PRACTICAL and ETHICAL solutions - as I am ALSO sure you know. Having said that, after responding to your comment I realized that you were the person who commented on my recent "400 Followers Milestone" post : https://steemit.com/steemit/@transcript-junky/400-follower-milestone-free-professional-edit-proofread-giveaway-for-interesting-posts where you provided a link to an interesting - albeit long and detailed - post. I had gotten caught up in work at the time, and totally forgot to comment (in the comments section of THAT post) that DID INDEED read a significant amount of that post. In fact, I read it in SECTIONS - as my time was limited - and after around 4-5 paragraphs I just didn't have additional time/energy to finish it. I will say that I DID INDEED enjoy the content of that post, and just thought that you would AT LEAST be happy to know that a significant portion of it was . As for THIS post you have made above I will stick with my PRINCIPLE that the "wording" of your comment was so off-putting that, unless you CHANGE that wording to something a bit more appropriate to the nature of this main post, I will continue to BOYCOTT following through with the links you have provided. The ball is in your court. If you deem it productive to "reiterate" your original comment I will check out the link. If not, that is completely your choice. In either case, I wish you the best of luck in your efforts...
Um... From what I see, it was You who initiated the drama here, so perhaps You might ask Yourself that question... I did nothing but express My surprise at the vehemence of Your response to My post, point out I merely made mention of My lack of interest in money as motive, gave You My purpose here, suggested that if that is not of interest to You, You needn't investigate, and said that I would move on. Hardly "drama."
I am not in the habit of changing My words beyond typos and faulty grammar. But if You clue Me in on what You want, beyond the vague "something a bit more appropriate to the nature of this main post" - I will be most happy to alter the post for You. Otherwise, I will shrug and accept that I can't please everyOne and, as I said, move on. [No drama intended.]
No problem. No need to go back and forth. Too many problems in the world right now. Please feel free to continue enjoying my posts (or not) at your discretion. Good luck.
Love always.