I completely agree, but maybe "Burn reward" should just be an option next to Decline Reward, It's already like that on https://condenser.steemliberator.com/submit.html
The reason Smooth is currently not using @null as beneficiary is that SBD are much higher so the actual amount of reward burned is much less as beneficiaries only receive SP, no SBD.
This could be changed in a future hardfork and was apparently just designed that way for coding convenience.
I would see the burn tab as the best way to discuss serious Steem issues and Important information. Much less greed and corruption and more content that matters.
Kindly tell me which one is more suitable 50%/50% or full power.as i am new comer so i am confiused
https://steemit.com/steemit/@geekorner/why-you-should-pick-the-50-50-reward-split-50-50
Im still new to this platform but i never understood why would anyone decline anything just pay it forward to some other cause. You shouldnt decline payment here since not all people here are the same or have same vision for the platform so when you say benefit whole platform you know that includes all those cunts that just want to manipulate system and cash out right ? So for example when all that shit happened with logan paul, youtubers were united more than ever. I kinda liked poor guys misery because all those years and people didnt see him for who he really was, and 1 bad shit later and you are dead for life. But thats not my point, my point is i started looking at other videos and how they handled the situation and lots of people were talking about not monetizing on their content. Well that the thing most of those people were wrong (atleast in my opinion) you dont stop monetizing then. At that point you monetize more and try to draw people away from those kind of toxic persons take that monetized money and find a way to get more good out of it than the bad that it was created in the first place. They could donate money to some suicide line or something send it to some charity or whatever they think is right but dont monetize its your job. And there is nothing wrong with that its not like you are a warmonger, you are just other side of the spectrum.
To that point this isnt content based platform, its more like money war platform where you need to outbid people to be seen more, and there is no organic growth potential. You cant even get to the content here because you cant even see it most of content is some sort of internal politics its like they are already dividing all the money they plan to spend in next 100 years, but in reality the ship has many leaks and is sinking. If the real vision for this platform it to be content driven they could learn lots of things from other platforms dont even need to use their brains that much can just copy most of it. Thats why i keep saying that technology wise this kind of platform will be the future but i doubt steemit will be it.
The ugly thing about this platform is money, so if its about content then good authors should be respected most of all but even if you are good author you will have hard time being seen here. I think people on top have no vision, if they do they clearly have no experience in content based platforms or content creation.