Hi! This post has a Flesch-Kincaid grade level of 5.3 and reading ease of 81%. This puts the writing level on par with Jane Austen and JK Rowling.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hi! This post has a Flesch-Kincaid grade level of 5.3 and reading ease of 81%. This puts the writing level on par with Jane Austen and JK Rowling.
I'm a bit ignorant on poetry, but I'll take that as a complement.
@pompe72 you responded to a new bot.
Yeah but that was my first day here, WTF did I know there bots going around.
Well williambanks, I would have liked to reply to you on that BOT BLOG. But but the thread ran out of space. So I'm replying to you here.
Go really deep.
Ask to youself: Am I a bot or am I not?
What I'm telling you is the answer is irrelevant to me.
The you I percieve here is not a person, neither am I. You are an identity, an account on a social media network. Whether there is a person, or an automaton behind that identity at any given point does not matter and is very likely to change frequently due to economic incentives. What matters is, "Do you contribute in a positive manner?"
We are running out of thread, so I'll continue the conversation here.
"Positive manner"? Who is to judge what is positive?
I had have made similar wisecracks (so to speek). For some I got a upvote, for some i got a downvote. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
But my reputation is at -5 with 60 upvotes and 9 downvotes. Therefore i assume that the votes are not weighted evenly.
Have you read any of my posts/replies williambanks? Did find them creative or not?
Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely