Infringement claims would have to go to the individual not the site. See Tumblr, for example. It basically exists by people sharing and reblogging content that doesn't belong to them, without any transformative activity applied to it. Now, they aren't making money, but, again, the money is coming from curation, not sales of the item, and most of these items are freely available online as it is. I do think attribution is essential, but Tumblr would've gone under by now if this was a massive legal problem.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: