There is a difference between how the system works, and how one FEELS that the system should work. The bottom line is the text of the law, not the assumption of the public. If I found one of my photos posted by someone else raking in a lot of money, I would pursue it no differently than if a magazine had printed it in one of their issues without permission. The burden of proof usually falls on the photographer to show if the perpetrator has made any money.
And I'll be darned if that info ain't available publicly here.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: