You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: PROPOSAL - How to DEFINE and FIGHT the BAD - Create a COMMITTEE with STRONG ARM to Support Creation of a GREAT STEEMIT CULTURE

in #steemitculture8 years ago

I think we mean exactly the same: I propose to establish a committee that leads whatever needs to be done to create a better culture. That gets to power to execute as well. Everything with vote from the community.

Just a few rogue whales could tank the thing by flagging all posts that the tribunal members make

We could implement a different vote weight, eg each vote is weighted the same, regardless of being a whale or a mini minnow. Than it is about how many users find something right or wrong, not about how much money someone has, more like a vote how it works in our countries political voting system. I for sure think that we need to create some technology to support the activities of a committee.

Looking forward to any further suggestions and comments, and follow on posts you may create!

Sort:  

Just reaching a consensus on whats 'right' and whats 'wrong' will take some time.

With so many sock puppet accounts, who is to say someone won't be able to influence the choices?

Apologies if I seem negative, just trying to highlight potential snags.

I am interested to see how this idea develops!

Thank you for pointing out the things that we need to take care of when we would get community voting enabled.

With so many sock puppet accounts, who is to say someone won't be able to influence the choices?

This may indeed be an issue, although we know of at least some of the sock puppet accounts, so they can be blocked from voting. Also, I think every account will need to cary the same vote weight, ie not depended on SP. From community members like @profitgenerator we can learn how voting could be done by setting the right levels for a YES/NO vote, eg set vote level at 70% or even 80% instead of relying on 50+% generally sued in countries political voting systems

meep

meep! :)

meep

Meep

meep