Try This Tricky Triangle Test!

[tradersharpe]

Let’s see how many of you can do this ...

Are you ready?

Here goes ...

Think!

Don’t peep!

Think some more!

Come on! You can do it!

Got it?

---

What is your answer? If you think the anwer is 2 : 3, then you are wrong! Gotcha!

You may have thought: there are 6 ratio parts which total 180°. So 1 part is 180° ÷ 6 = 30°, and 4 parts is 30° × 4 = 120°. Considering the sides opposite their respective angles, we have the ratio 120° : 180° or just 4 : 6 = 2 : 3 and that is the answer.

What is wrong with that? Well, the ratio of the angles is not the same as the ratio of their opposite sides.

Tricky, eh? So how to do this correctly?

Draw a 120°-30°-30° triangle and let the sides opposite the 30° be 1 unit (for convenience). If you drop a perpendicular from the 120° vertex to its opposite side, you cut the triangle into two congruent halves, each of which is a right-angled triangle. Using basic trigonometry for right-angled triangles (a.k.a. “toa cah soh” or something like that), we can figure out each half of the longest side as being . Remember that cosine = adjacent ÷ hippopotamus ... i mean ... er ... hypotenuse, and cos 30° = . So the ratio of the longest side to the perimeter works out to be : , or equivalently, : 1, which happens to be also the same as 1 : . Decimally, it works out to be 1 : 2.15 or thereabouts.

OK, suppose now we are not given 4 : 1 : 1 as the ratio of angles. What happens in the general case? Well, in the general case, we would need to appeal to the Sine Rule or the Law of Sines.

.

The Sine Rule basically says that the ratio of the sides is proportional not to their respective opposite angles, but to the sines of those angles. Thus, for the general case, the answer would be sin A : sin A + sin B + sin C, if A is the largest angle.

I hope you have learned something from this tricky problem. Don't feel bad if you have got it wrong. There is something new to learn every day.

Comments

[angel35mm]

Learn something new everyday! Thanks for this!

[raphi00]

I got the correct answer!

[steemitboard]

Congratulations @tradersharpe! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

[qurator]

Qurator	Your Quality Content Curator
	here for more info.This post has been upvoted and given the stamp of authenticity by @qurator. To join the quality content creators and receive daily upvotes click

[minnowpond1]

This post recieved an upvote from minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowpond on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond

[tradersharpe]

@originalworks

[originalworks]

The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @tradersharpe to be original material and upvoted it!

To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!

For more information, Click Here! || Check out our contests as well!
Special thanks to @reggaemuffin for being a supporter! Vote him as a witness to help make Steemit a better place!

To enter this post into the daily RESTEEM contest, upvote this comment! The user with the most upvotes on their @OriginalWorks comment will win!

[zambranoacosta]

Good post, in principle when I saw the trianle I first thought in the law of sines.

[bikash-tutor]

30 30 120