Lol, I'm not blowing anything out of proportion. What you said mentioned nothing of Steem.
Make it far more expensive than 40 cents, indeed, but a reasonable and consistent cost as well.
Which is what I was replying to. That doesn't even refer to the price in Steem at all. It's just bad wording is all. Because you can't say make it far more expensive than 40 cents and then say it should be reasonable because those two statements can be contradictory if the reasonable cost was 40 cents.
You're not seeing the entire picture. It seems like you're arguing for the sake of argument. I feel it should cost more than 40 cents, but certainly not 1000 STEEM like yabapmatt suggested, due to the fact that could lead to the problem you don't want to see, which is the cost being out of reach for most people. I said, there must be a happy middle ground somewhere, and the cost should be set and not tied to the value of STEEM.
I'm not arguing at all. I was just making my point about what your original comment was. And I think we've pretty much come to the agreement on the fixed price.
But, I'm not here to argue the semantics. I think we've made our points and this discussion has gotten as far as it can go.
Good talk.
When you include the rest of the context here, including the words written in the post, and the comment I was responding to — of course I mentioned STEEM. It costs three STEEM. Three STEEM is worth about 40 cents today. That's where this number comes from. STEEM.
Bad wording, okay, fine. Your reading comprehension might need some work as well. That's life. These communication breakdowns happen online all the time. It's nothing personal.
Have a good day.
That's why I said not going to argue the semantics. :P
But, take care, have a good one too dude.