May I suggest making this provably fair by using proof of work submissions as your random number source and then publishing the algorithm used by the bot so everyone can know who should win?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
May I suggest making this provably fair by using proof of work submissions as your random number source and then publishing the algorithm used by the bot so everyone can know who should win?
That sounds like a great idea. They should definitely go with provably fair! Using double T would also be a good option to decrease errors from people sending funds to incorrect accounts.
I for one would like to second the above suggestion.
If you use a strong enough algorithm no one would be able to hash it out in 24 hours. No crypto is truly 100% unbreakable, but you would only need to secure it long enough to surpass the 24 hour mark before someone would have to start all over again from scratch.