As I mentioned, I am in total agreement with a subsequent / follow-up vote to provide greater clarity on who is eligible for a refund and who is not.
But I don't think the reasoning is because of supposed "manipulation" (which I don't think is the case). I think private discussions are okay but this exchange between Aggroed and Cryptomancer illustrates how there was ambiguity and uncertainty regarding who Proposal #3 would apply to, so I think some subsequent votes would allow SPS stakeholders to narrow down the criteria and vote on it.
it is too late for a subsequent vote, on the 27th there will be airdrops.....