Hell the Cannon Camera was top quality work considering some of the other posts by @amanat1993
Here is another upvoted shit post winner by the same guy.
This one really touches the soul.. makes me introspective about life and forces me to wonder "what really does happen when the shit hits the fan?"...
Aww, 🐾 paws. That post was kind of funny 💃🏽💃🏽
thanks.. i try
I can't believe that's real. I have spent the last 30 seconds just shaking my head and laughing. Dafuq kind of fan is that anyway? Christ, It's not even a good picture of a fan. Is that even a fan? Wow. It reminds me of like People of Walmart or Pinterest Fails. I honestly think you could make a good amount of money on here just from your shit post compilations! Seriously. I hope you can get that tag trending damnit. I will help you get that tag trending. It has to happen now, bahaha.
Yeah its a real post for sure... https://steemit.com/photography/@amanat1993/fan-image and I agree, its not even a good picture of a fan..
Crazy!
Awwww...you like that one? What about this one? https://steemit.com/sportsphotography/@r351574nc3/tucson-soccerfest-sunset
I spent hours in the AZ heat and sun waiting for that sunset. Grumpycat downvoted me to $5. Essentially, telling me my time was worth $5. Thanks @grumpycat.
I don't know what there is to agree with @grumpycat on. @grumpycat doesn't even agree with @grumpycat. @grumpycat abuses self-voting. @grumpycat has also bid on 6th day voting bots in the past 11 days.
AAAAAAND@grumpycat doesn't have any good points. Voting bots don't hurt the reward pool. They're a supplemental feature for a broken promotion system. People are responsible for abusing the reward pool they'd do it with or without the voting bots. You get rid of the voting bots and you still have people trying to abuse it one way or another. One really good example are self-voter (Oh? Like @grumpycat?)
Ok. Last point. Downvoting is a feature that was intended for the community to regulate/correct payout rewards for posts. It's not intended to punish people. It's intended for users to adjust the payout to what they believe is fair. So if you think a post doesn't deserve to be $1, you can downvote to make it appropriate to what you think is fair. That IS the way it's supposed to work.
WHICH IS COMPLETE ABUSE OF THE DOWNVOTE FEATURE@grumpycat downvotes indiscriminate of the content
IMHO, downvotes are intended to be used responsibly by responsible adults (NOT @grumpycat).
There. I've said my piece.
I think you guys are missing the beauty of this post. The caption "Fun image" really says everything about the picture. It truly is a "fun image". I will have sooooo much fun flagging this shit post. I only regret I can't do it twice.