First off, I'm kind of shocked that anyone has any kind of problem with the way @phelimint is running STAX. He deserves every 100% upvote EVERY time. He's put in the work and earned it. As for @qurator, eh...for now it's viable.
And what's this liquidating the SP nonsense? We want STAX to be a TOTAL badass or just ya know, almost-a-badass-but-not-quite-because-we're-whining-about-the-rewards-and-how-they're-distributed? The rewards anyone gets from STAX is because they upvote her and delegate. That's what we all signed up for and should be more than enough. That's where my vote goes. Why in the heck would you want to concede to relying on delegation from anywhere else but within the organization? Seems to devalue what has been and is being built. Self-reliance, am I right guys? Where is the stacker attitude I love??? Buying delegations may make her more powerful, but there is no guarantee that bought delegation will be there a week later. Building STAX does guarantee that she continues to grow and support everyone with a stronger arm in the long run.
I do like the split rewards notion. I would most assuredly delegate more if that were an option. And it doesn't even need to be 50/50. Hell Phil, keep 75% or even 80%. Far as I'm concerned, that would be a badass bonus ON TOP OF THE ALREADY SWEET VOTES WE ARE ALL GETTING.
-Witty