I appreciate your enthusiasm for science, and your idea for getting people involved. However, my current stance on science is that everything I have been taught is wrong. EVERYTHING!
Such as, you obviously are going for the birth, life and death of stars, in the above pictures.
However, I no longer believe in black holes. They are a mental construct because of the immense amount of gravity that would be needed to hold a galaxy together. And then this nice lady astronomer found that spiral galaxies spin as one. Like all of the stars were glued to a plate. This pretty much destroys the notion of gravity as the force to hold together the galaxy, and thus eliminates the need for anything like a "black hole".
Further, working with the electric universe models, black holes don't, and can't exist. And stars are not formed by big piles of gas all gathering together.
So, I will bow out of your contests, and try not to post disrupting replies.
But we can observe black holes' effects... We can see light bend around them, stars fling wildly as if grabbed by an immense source of gravity. It's crazy to imagine, and we obviously can't see them directly, but if not a black hole, what could be causing all the observations that we contribute to the existence of black holes?
I do not know what you mean by "stars fling wildly". All stars in a spiral galaxy go around the center at the same revolutionary speed. As if all the stars where pasted to a plate.
Most of the other effects are all hypothesis and urban legends. There are too many stars in the way to see what is at the center of the milkyway galaxy. Other galaxies are too far away to get an accurate view of what is at the center.
We don't know what it is, however, I can tell you it is not powered by gravity.
It is, imho a completely new set of forces that science hasn't even postulated yet. Like the strong and weak nuclear forces, we may be looking at the strong and weak galactic forces.
Further, astronomers have been viewing what they call jets from the center of galaxies emanating out from the center of the disk. It could be that these are actually energy flowing in. Or one could be an out, and the other an in.
Stars don't orbit the center of a galaxy at the same speed though. Here's just one of many links I found with a super quick search.
https://phys.org/news/2017-08-stars-orbiting-supermassive-black-hole.amp
And a timelapse of observations made of stars orbiting a central point (a black hole)
Look up Vera Rubins.
Sorry, I have not the internet to watch this video, but I doubt that it is real. It is most likely a CGI of a concept.
Because Vera Rubins took decades to make sure her observations were correct. Do you feel you can do time laps photography over decades?
With satelites, yes. Those are images taken once every few months. I'll look up your nice lady astronomer, but I'm pretty sure she hasn't proven Einstein wrong.
Einstein wrong? Oh, that's another lady astronomer.
Einstein's theories predicted the orbit of Mercury to about 96%, this lady theory predicts to 99.999%. (sorry, it will take me forever to find her name)
Further, either Einstein is correct or Tesla is correct.
My money is on Tesla.
Can't say I didn't try. If you're willing to refute evidence when it's placed in front of you, there's nothing else to be said.