@suesa : Distributing money is a tricky thing. I agree. I think we will attract more quality writers, but. One suggestion can be 1/2 the money for steemSTEM maintenance and half for the author if they joins the community. I know it may sound immature, but there is lot of noise in the community, right now. The only way to overcome is through quality content and curation. I believe that Stackoverflow model is a great way to maintain quality. I see lot of articles with no substance in steemit. Bad for both STEEM and #steemSTEM. One more thing: I think if we believe in science and there are steemSTEM articles which propagates nonsense, flagging should be done after warning. Like steemSTEM trail being used for appreciating great posts, there should also be flagging against wrong content if they use steemSTEM tag.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I personally don't like flagging things that aren't spam or plagiarism, and I am not sure we should use the trail and our delegated power for it. But it's something that will have to be discussed.