You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The psychology behind conspiracy theories

in #steemstem6 years ago (edited)

the statistical probability of terrorist attacks taking place on specific numerologically significant dates

It was an interesting read thanks, a little bit far fetched for the unseasoned, you gotta love that dude in the comment starting talking probability. I do understand that a longer time frame would probably give a more accepted result as he is very right to admit that date can be interpreted to fit a narrative.

What you say about sibel is quite true, and it feels that she only speaks in the presence of James Corbett or Inforwars and would probably benefit from posting her own videos, however after making a deposition the way she did, there's probably pressure that we're not aware of too.

I want to add that I stopped watching RT , I still check from time to time their articles and video, but found it overall as biased as CNN and at first tapped into the alternative audience, then went more and more far right.

Meaning that there's no reliable source of info anymore across the board. Biased on each side

Sort:  

I like to look at maths since it produces data that cannot really be refuted without something substantial being presented to do so.

Sibel has her own news network - Newsbud - and regularly speaks independently there. She has hundreds of videos by now. Newsbud was intended to be an unbiased new source, but it has it's own bias too.