I do not see this as a form of attack against steemstem, but rather to motivate women writers to be more active in the field of STEM, the theoretical only provide data and processed by writing different perspectives
I really appreciate the difference of opinion you give to me
as an engineer, I would also consider statistical data even though the reality is different.
I will not speak harshly, because language actually reflects the level of intellect
thanks again for giving me a different view that I had not thought of before
steem on
although he ( @teukumukhlis ) did not claim to know exactly how many women writers are curated by steemstem
what can be inferred from this difference of opinion "it is time for women writers to be more active in the field of STEM" or will more @teukumukhlis others who will start criticizing.
@lemouth, @justtryme90,
@suesa, @ruth-girl and @trumpman thank you for your valuable explanation and explain how steemstem works :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: