We have data. The observations are pretty robust. If what we have observed do not consist of gravitational waves, then please tell me what it is.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
We have data. The observations are pretty robust. If what we have observed do not consist of gravitational waves, then please tell me what it is.
All of your references have to do with frequency, vibration and magnetism, except for the ones with neutron stars and black holes, as those are just cosmic fairy tales.
Nothing of which involves the mathematical theory of gravity.
I am afraid I have nothing I can do for you. Take a theory, you can make predictions. Take data, you can confront them to predictions. If they agree, the theory holds. If not, the theory does not hold.
The electric universe disagrees with data. End of the story. If you want to throw away a part of the data, it is up to you, but this is not how science works.