You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What really is ‘New Fire’ Fuel?

in #steemstem7 years ago

Jouni Tuomela - comment on ECW

Does this have any relevance

"In a micro-bubble implosion, a unique phenomenon occurs in which ions (charged particles) converge to a single point in space at half the speed of light. This phenomenon, which looks like the opposite of the Big Bang, is essentially different from any previously discovered or proposed acceleration principles."

Answer:

Good find Jouni and yes - very relevant.

This is Excellent verification of both LeClaire / Nanospire (who also often used laser pulses for cavitation), and Suhas Ralkar fuel processing. Both have cavitation, though I believe that Nanospire's / Ralkar's approach of having the bubble collapse asymmetrically against a ridged lattice, resulting in the bubble forming a 'spire' is more energetic and active due to induce helicity not present in symmetric collapse.

As I have said in previous presentations, I believe that the accelerated protons are those that are ejected from, in Adamenkos words, the "electron-nucleon macro-cluster" as heavier elements are formed which need to loose protons to ensure stability.

IMPO, they will find that they have synthesised elements.

Sort:  

However, the melting point of Pb is very low. When the temperature is high, Pb melts and the fuel powder sticks together.
Pb should be a substance produced by the LNER reaction. I think Pb is not an active substance.

The presentation goes to great lengths to show evidence that Pb is a product of the active agent.

The active agent, when driven at a certain level and presented with say PbS or PbO or Pb and C may yield other elements and products.

No active agent and it does not matter what else is in the cell.