No, no, I didn’t think so ... quite the opposite ... your comments are always positive and wonderful, so it beautify my day and put a smile on my face :)
Thank you for reading and commenting. In addition, thanks for the helpful advice for references, I’ll do it the next time for sure. I just listed references in the order in which I used them, but I’ll gladly add numbers :)
Thank you very much for reading and good question.
An additional amount of energy is required for the formation of elements heavier than iron, which explains the accumulation of significant amounts of iron in the cosmos. On the other hand, the observed observation also explains the fact that the representation of elements with a regular number less than 30 and in several orders of magnitude greater than those of a larger regular number whose endoterm is a process and whose abundance in the cosmos is approximately same.
The exception is the increase in the concentration of lead due to the fact that it is the product of almost every radioactive series, and over time it has accumulated due to the decay of unstable radioactive elements heavier than lead.
I hope that it is a little bit clearer now and if you have any other questions be free to ask. I’ll be happy to answer :)
Thank you, as if you were reading my thoughts :). I have something similar in my plan for students in Serbia, but maybe in the future from these steemit lessons.
This is a very good chemical composition, I see a good figure has become a chemical researcher, there is one interesting knowledge that I get here, thanks, best regards for you
In physical cosmology, the age of the universe is the time elapsed since the Big Bang. The current measurement of the age of the universe is 13.799±0.021 billion years within the Lambda-CDM concordance model. Source
very good for science, you are able to provide material for the next generation of chemists later
Thank you very much ... your comments always make me smile :).
haa haa i know ,, my language is very messy for the expression english, lol
No, no, I didn’t think so ... quite the opposite ... your comments are always positive and wonderful, so it beautify my day and put a smile on my face :)
Is it true,,? I am embarrassed,, :)
:D hahahahaa
Congrats to the photographer as well, great photo.
And of course, a good story about the elements.
Formatting tip for references, start each row with 1. Title
and next one also with 1. Title 2, it will change automatically to 1, 2...
Thank you for reading and commenting. In addition, thanks for the helpful advice for references, I’ll do it the next time for sure. I just listed references in the order in which I used them, but I’ll gladly add numbers :)
I figured as much. How much is known about the formation of elements that are heavier than iron, which require energy to be effected?
Thank you very much for reading and good question.
An additional amount of energy is required for the formation of elements heavier than iron, which explains the accumulation of significant amounts of iron in the cosmos. On the other hand, the observed observation also explains the fact that the representation of elements with a regular number less than 30 and in several orders of magnitude greater than those of a larger regular number whose endoterm is a process and whose abundance in the cosmos is approximately same.
The exception is the increase in the concentration of lead due to the fact that it is the product of almost every radioactive series, and over time it has accumulated due to the decay of unstable radioactive elements heavier than lead.
I hope that it is a little bit clearer now and if you have any other questions be free to ask. I’ll be happy to answer :)
Very good writing. You should write a textbook!
Thank you, as if you were reading my thoughts :). I have something similar in my plan for students in Serbia, but maybe in the future from these steemit lessons.
Изврстан текст @nataschachem :)
Hvala puno :)
This is a very good chemical composition, I see a good figure has become a chemical researcher, there is one interesting knowledge that I get here, thanks, best regards for you
Thank you a lot for reading and commenting.
You are welcome, just look around and find you here, if you not mind l followed you, nice to know you lady
Thank you, pleasure is mine.
I am totally educated by this piece, but if you say "over 4 billion years ago" how old is the universe??!
In physical cosmology, the age of the universe is the time elapsed since the Big Bang. The current measurement of the age of the universe is 13.799±0.021 billion years within the Lambda-CDM concordance model. Source
Beauty and wisdom unite in one beautiful woman! Literate and informative lectures. It's too hard for my mind. But your work is magnificent!
Thank you very much Tanata for such nice compliments! It is very encouraging that I read this from you :) I'll continue to do my best :)
Good job :) continue
Thank you so much... I'll give my best :)