Like i said, the use of widely used terms or definitions cannot and would never be referred to as plagiarism. Plagiarism is the use of an author's original idea which those terms you quoted are nobody's original idea but well known facts. See this which i even quoted as one of my references >>>scientificamerican
Please re-read my article and gain the knowledge. Thanks!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Dude, what he meant is your sentence's structure. Your sentences and NOT ONLY your terms or definitions were similar to some sources found on the internet. I don't think you understand plagiarism or what kind of crimes you have committed.
Dude, I don't think you understand whatever. SIMILAR is not SAME.
I don't think I have mentioned plagiarism means it should be the SAME. SIMILAR can be passed off as plagiarism especially when it is intended.
OMG please i intended nothing. I put in work and i wrote my article myself with quoted researched websites. Y'all are just unbelievable. This is science not some storybook writing.
Just leave him be @conficker. It was pointless anyway.