Well ,what will i say,but I know for sure that the community has done a great job in helping everyone on the platform.
However,how many of us that have been receiving curation from the community even deem it fit to give back?.Well, someone might just ask me that question.
But I think that instead of the community members complaining,why don't we all look around and see how we can support our community to become stronger than how we met it.
I believe that as one is growing up, one need more helping hand.The community has more members than when it started so more demand is coming from all.
How ever,i think the community should let everyone know that it's not a father Christmas dishing out free curation for just any content.
Also,I think if the community could look into the activities of those who consistently receive curation and yet not powering up or delegate some of their steem to support ,then why can't they give such an author a break in curation.
Another point, if there is anyway the community can place priority on author's contribution to other people post before they curate such author content ,I think it will go a long way in helping the community to grow together.What I mean is that if an author over the past two days have upvoted and commented on other post,that should be a part of the criteria to curate their own good content.
Then if there is any complaint of not being curated and such want to make noise why can't we institute a ban.
I want to appreciate everyone that has give us a shoulder to learn on steemSTEM, people's like
They are all great people.Though I may not be able to mention all but they have really sacrificed towards this community.
Let all join hands together and make it work better!!.Thanks
@justtryme90
@mobbs
@suesa
@lemouth
@Abigael-dantes
@trumpman
@annachyasnogod.
@greenrun
@gentleshaid
Thank you :)
The problem with checking each author's engagement before curating them is, that it requires a lot of additonal work on top of what we're already doing. But we will try to find ways.
Thanks! This is exactly our point!