Great choice of a paper to analyze. It's open access with a clear goal and a focus on relevant modern techniques. However, it is obtusely dense and includes a few extra figures that don't add much to the core story (blame it on being a nature publication). Your summary definitely makes it easier to understand.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well I was only trying to hit the major points :)
I left out a lot, and certainly some relevant material. I didn't even explain the material in full detail because I don't feel that diving down that far into the weeds is important for a non "expert in the field" audience.
Anyway thanks T.