Thanks for reading and also for the contribution. But I want to correct an impression you just made. In science, one man's work cannot overrule another if his work isn't supported by other scientists.
The fact i stated there is being confirmed by so many scientists and researchers, so a single textbook doesn't prove it wrong. However, I'm grateful you pointed me to it, I'll have to read more on it. Thanks once again.
Well, it would be unreasonable to quote 50 texts just to give you an idea, isn't it? If there is other literature which proved that cardiac muscles use glucose more than acetoacetate, you can state your references and reading materials. It would be better for a STEM-related article anyway. Sometimes a single textbook is capable of changing the view of hundreds. Whatever that has been proved in the past doesn't mean it is still true now. It's how knowledge expanded. Do your reading and let me know if you found something valid.
No problem