And to answer your question, I can see both sides on this. On the one hand it didn't belong to the artists. On the other hand the foot traffic that was brought to the area because of the art is a form of value. Unless I was really bleeding money I would've left it. Owner made a mistake.
Hmm well I see what you're saying then. To be clear I don't actually think those artists deserve any compensation. It wasn't their property. I can just understand why they'd be upset.
Yes all gone and whitewashed I haven’t been past for a couple of months so not sure how much ch construction has taken place
And to answer your question, I can see both sides on this. On the one hand it didn't belong to the artists. On the other hand the foot traffic that was brought to the area because of the art is a form of value. Unless I was really bleeding money I would've left it. Owner made a mistake.
Well the buildings were empty other than the graffiti artist so they foot traffic to the area did not help the owner
As far as I know the plan is to demolish and build new
Hmm well I see what you're saying then. To be clear I don't actually think those artists deserve any compensation. It wasn't their property. I can just understand why they'd be upset.
Ohh yes I understand why there upset as well and the owner should have handled it so much better