Sort:  

As I said I am not claiming that the numbers are right. However, the rewards are split in 3:1 ratio, therefore authors rewards make 75% of total rewards in the end.

Yes, it appears so that in rewards_tokens the full rewards are included.

Edit: https://github.com/steemit/steem/blob/master/libraries/chain/database.cpp#L4897 Curation rewards ratio.

I think you're right :(

get_curation_rewards_percent takes comment as a parameter, but doesn't do anything with it and returns always 25%.

And then in pay_curators there is this piece of code:

if( !c.allow_curation_rewards )
      {
         unclaimed_rewards = 0;
         max_rewards = 0;
      }

Which (imo without a reason) resets all curation rewards to 0. I opened an issue to find out if it's a feature or a bug.

Thanks a lot for pointing that out! We will have to update the way how steeve vote beneficiaries are implemented, but the general idea is still valid.

Posted using Steeve, an AI-powered Steem interface

bump to follow this thread when the results come back from the newest test. hope you will provide your findings here @hr1, thanks.

I just did.

Posted using Steeve, an AI-powered Steem interface

I have the results of the test. You were right, disabled curation rewards returns them into the reward pool.

I created 2 test comments and upvoted them right after. The first one had disabled curation rewards, the second one allowed. There is no difference between their author rewards (except the few satoshis due to the decreased voting power on second comment).

curationauthor rewardscuration rewardslink
disabled0.098 STEEM and 0.098 SP0https://steemd.com/b/28565512
allowed0.094 STEEM and 0.095 SP0https://steemd.com/b/28566233

Posted using Steeve, an AI-powered Steem interface