3rd sentence.
He wasn't targeted for anything, but spam.
But, he misunderstood that, and reacted emotionally.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
3rd sentence.
He wasn't targeted for anything, but spam.
But, he misunderstood that, and reacted emotionally.
I think you misunderstand his meaning. I took it to mean causing them to leave the platform because of deliberately and punitively taxing their content. Also, making the content require clicking to reveal it disables certain automated uses.
Many things HW does are intended to produce emotional responses. HW does appear to be a mechanism intended to reduce Hive's user base. That has certainly been it's consequence. Enabling automation of data recording isn't spamming. I don't find any points of agreement with HW on this matter.
Also, the third sentence would be the secondary, or even tertiary complaint, since it followed the text I have quoted that also contained complaints. I think we will continue to disagree on this, and I don't think either of us will convince the other of our views, so I will find something else to do.
Let's abandon flags.
And votes also.
Right
@valued-customer @indextrader24
Lol @antisocialist
Reactionary violence must be an option, or things get out of hand.
I wouldn't call it that.
But I guess I see where you're coming from. Self-defence.
But I am calling it self-regulation.
Balancing.
There can't be votes without flags.
Or what will be the regulation mechanism?
Going back to centralized oversight? And people hate hw
But don't get that what they wish for is exactly what they hate and fear the most.. and hw was only a joke against it..
Driving off ~1m users was a lot worse for Hive than whatever good you think they were even trying to do.
I feel no desire to post or create content or beauty until I feel free in totality from now and unto perpetuity.
Why does voting require regulation and balancing? Hive requires upvotes. It does not require downvotes. Only governments claiming the power to enslave their subjects tax. Hive is not such a government, and has no need of taxes. There is nothing good or useful to the platform that comes of flags. There is much and bad that does, though.
Sorry have not seen ur comments until now
And also only by accident
I remember why I've blocked you
So you still want to ban the selfregulation mechanism and cannot see any reason why not?
Even though I told you like a million times?
Okay - one simple question:
Without downvotes. How do you counter abuse, plagiarism, or even straight up pedophiles voting each others pedo posts?
Not at all?
Great! And now go and find a brain.
You are against centralised oversight but want to take away the tools from the community to prevent that. And therefore just manifest exactly what you do not want.
Anyway, I surrendered trying to argue with you long ago. And you will stay blocked.
Maybe you should also read @antisocialist @jin-out @daretodefy
https://peakd.com/hive/@khrom/why-downvotes-contradict-decentralization-a-mathematical-perspective
DV's are not a means of avoiding centralization, but of ensuring it.
Your resort to ad hominems demonstrates why you cannot tolerate rational discussion, because you demonstrate you are incapable of it.
Remain ignorant as your policies depend on, since the ability to reason eludes you, as that is all blocking arguments you cannot answer enables you to do. It emulates what you do in your head, blocking reason out when it conflicts with your biases.
Cheers for that @woelfchen!
@valued-customer cannot read and is a leech who wants upvoted without downvotes
Too dumb to realize that would mean the death of hive
Because open doors for abusers
Just because this leech cries about a few cents of downvotes
Not being ABLE to realize that we would not loose a few cents by flags but the whole platform
When abolishing downvotes