After all I said and done, you still think I own those 2 accounts, even though you have zero evidence to prove it.
I can only refute valid evidence. Since your evidence is non-existent, there's nothing else for me to refute.
Believe what you want but please refrain yourself from saying that your opinion is "solid proof."
Nope, I said mitrado is behind those accounts. Plenty of proof in the post, feel free to refute any of it.
I would refute if there was any proof in your post. Sadly, there is not.
So you couldn't prove that I'm @mitrado, you couldn't prove that @mitrado is @kawaiicrush or @savedtheturtles.
What exactly did you prove?