To go in-depth into the concept of ‘choice’
(excluding the perception of an outside observer for a moment) if someone chooses to adhere to principles of a political/religious/cultural/etc ideal/ideology, or behaves in a manner of which they've considered moral, or is a law abiding citizen, etc.. by what objective standard should we consider those behaviors ‘just’ or ‘in the right’?
is this contingent on the basis of such behaviors being authenticated as an objective truth? (how would one even go about accounting a methodology of substantiating such?)we all know that nature/nurture/education/indoctrinations/etc that manifests into human nature can be flawed/false.. and like all things counterfeit, sometimes ideas can be conjured up by those of ill intent, only to be circulated by good people who wish nothing but the best intent for humanity..
`can someone even make the right choice, if they lack the right information, (or haven’t the ‘complete’ information?), or the information is open to interpretation? How do we know.. what we know to be right, is true?
Sort: Trending