Hi Titus, joined steemit to ask a question.
Jesuits or who at the top? And is it important to know?
Here is what I think
a) It's a unbroken line of Lucifarian/Satanists (yes, understand the point you make on the distinction) worshippers from Egyptian times.
b) they were involved in the fall of Babylon and the missing period in the bible is missing because it details how they did that
c) The core money they have today comes down via trade in the silk route and Khazarian tribes who chose Judaism (Solzhenitsyn describes in detail the conversion of the Khazarian tribe to Judaism and these people were truly evil)
d) a key piece of evidence is the courier struck by lightning in Bavaria leading to raids which was a setback for them albeit temporary. e) the Templars were also (is that also a result of the lightning strike?) disbanded but shortly after the Knights Garter arose (was this group the power behind the British Empire?).
So I conclude that they are an extremely small group (less than 300 per Churchill) and that they hide behind layers of lies and use various entities they create as foils to be sacraficed is/as and when they are come under attack = Jews, masons, templars. This is their primary tool: creation of a patsy/boogie man and using false accusations to bear public opinion against them.
Also being a small group (with no public name?) each probably with the power to take any one of the other out what is the thing that has allowed to exist so long? What has stopped them from self destructing into splintering factions?
So question is why do you think the Jesuits are the core/top and how have they retained that position.
Does it matter? Maybe it does, because if one part of the rot is missed .... Anyway you do do great work and you are one very brave person all respect and prayers to you and to all your supporters.
PS. Have seen this Peter and Paul Manning "Martin Boremann ..."
Also the Norman Dodds 1982 interview by G E Griffinn (up there with the Benjamin Freedman 1961 speech)