![871286361673233d9a263bfe4265bf70.jpg](https://images.hive.blog/768x0/https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSAMdFY3B3uRxnj2sKRHBbTfJehcU3jPuDq3qXwigHX2F/871286361673233d9a263bfe4265bf70.jpg)
Things designed by people without skin in the game tend to grow in complication (before their final collapse).
There is absolutely no benefit for someone in such a position to propose something simple:
when you are rewarded for perception, not results, you need to show sophistication.
Anyone who has submitted a “scholarly” paper to a journal knows that you usually raise the odds of acceptance by making it more complicated than necessary.
Further, there are side effects for problems that grow nonlinearly with such branching-out complications.
Worse: Non-skin-in-the-game people don’t get simplicity.
from 'Skin in the Game' by by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B077QY23RV