Explain what you mean? How can we even agree on a definition of what human is without using computers? Can anyone be said to know 100% of what a human is? I would say probably very few if any.
So the concept and model of what a human is has to be defined. We have to then agree on what does and does not constitute a human. Once we all reach an agreement on what "human" is, then we can have discussions about what the future of "human" should be.
In my own opinion, most people don't know what human even is. Most do not have full understanding of biology, anatomy, or any of the necessary knowledge to create an accurate mental model. For this reason we have certain people in our world who deliberately dehumanize other people. How can we become more human if most of us don't even know how to define human and even if we agree on what human is then the question on what human can be is an open question.
For example is human a species permanently restricted to living on earth or does human as a species seek to evolve to exist on other planets? If the answer to this question is the humans want to evolve to live on other planets then the nature of what human can be is permanently and necessarily changed by that goal.
Tauchain is necessary to even have that kind of discussion. A person can on Steem claim they believe in space travel while also claiming they don't believe in transhumanism. They would be potentially contradicting themselves. A human simply cannot even travel in space without becoming what some call a cyborg (wearing a space suit, using machines to support life, etc).
So human in the unmodified traditional definition is as limited as the other species of earth.
Now as to using the data spit out of a computer to decide? That is exactly what a program is. A program decides. So for example if it's medicine then how do you think we determine kidney health? There is no direct way to measure it so we use a formula which runs on a computer using detectable enzymes in the blood like creatinine level. We basically take the individual human in the case of personalized medicine and we digitize them, and then we run tests or crunch on that digital representation.
The same is true for genome sequencing. If you want to know what a human is then you have to analyze the code which makes a human up. If you want to know what you are don't you think having your genes analyzed would give you greater insight into that? Of course you would learn from that and the question is would you let the computer tell you that you're genetically vulnerable and adapt to this or would you ignore it?
The computer can't make your decision for you. You ultimately have to decide. The computer and "thinking machines" only can help you to better decide by allowing you to export your thinking outside of your brain and into mechanical minds. Excuse me if I have no better way of expressing these ideas because this is next generation blockchain tech we are contemplating.
I think I understand what your saying...and thank you for taking the time.
In my opinion, you might be confusing what a human is with what a human does, or is capable of doing.
To keep it simple, a human is what is birthed from combining a male human sperm with a female human egg. Now we can choose to travel into space, or maybe even one day live on another planet. If we did, we may evolve to that environment, much like astronauts start to evolve when they spend to much time in space. Their bones get brittle, but their senses learn how to become oriented in a zero gravity environment. That doesn't change who they are or make then less human, it just means they've adapted to their environment. Humans have always been able to adapt.
To use an example on earth, when a blind person develops an incredible sense of hearing and smell to compensate for their lack of vision. That doesn't make them any less human, they've just adapted or evolved. So I think we can define what a human being is, while still allowing for changes. After all, no 2 human is exactly the same, but we are all part of the same species. Even if we start to incorporated computers to our body...which we already do with pacemakers and other medical devises, we still remain human. We're just attaching something to our body.
My only point in all this was to say we need to always make sure a human has the last word. I don't ever want to live in a society where computers judge us. We can, and do, use computers as tools to help us make decisions, but that's very different than a computer having the last word. Hope I've explained my self properly.