Mozilla Foundation whom have been taking a more "activist" approach to their branding believes internet should be a global entitlement.
As seen on Mozzila's "A $2 Million Prize to Decentralize the Web."
First of all, the internet is by default, accessible and open to all. Places that do not have internet either don't have the infrastructure for internet and/ or don't find it a priority.
The internet is accessible if you're willing to do the work. You need an ISP (or make your own), and an internet capable device. For example, your home is accessible if you're willing to unlock the door with your key. If you don't have a home, then you have to work for one.
In order to entitle everyone to internet you need a centralized power that can distribute resources to the least competent users which conflicts with Mozzila's decentralized web.
Some questions I'd ask Mozilla:
- Is high speed internet connection a first wold problem?
- What's the environmental impact of internet for everyone?
- Would we see suicide rates increase in once unconnected groups?