One other problem to note, is that the only use-case for this is to prove consent was given.
If consent was given on the blockchain, and then given in person, and nobody was hurt - No different than without the blockchain.
If consent was given on the blockchain, but then retracted in person - bad.
If consent was given, and then someone is falsely accused of rape - The only real use case.
False accusations are so ridiculously rare compared to rape, that having an entire ecosystem meant to protect men from being falsely accused of rape is not only a waste of time, but actually bad for the fight against rape being so ubiquitous.
What about a person simply stealing the private keys. What then? I seriously think that the devs are trolling or just released some random fun project they cooked up. If somebody get your crypto wallet you simply loose funds. If you get hacked with this app, you are getting gang raped and hackers will get away with serial gang rape. Probably a perfect scenario for a Black Mirror episode.
I hope some SJW won't pick this up and take the whole thing seriously. I don't want to see the real world become a superficial dystopia.
Why would SJWs like this app? I actually want them to take this seriously and burn it like the awful idea that it is.
They have a tendency to pick the awful and senseless ideas. Give them a good idea and they'll reject. Give them a bad one and they'll consider. It's sad but it's true.
Problem is it didn't even help in the false accusation case. Someone gives their consent then one party starts getting violent, or one party for any reason decides the deal is off (change of heart does happen you know) how does that work? So you wear a "I don't consent" emergency button to cancel the contract?