Great post on great information brother! I find this technology very interesting and is much needed. My only concern is that there are health repercussions in direct exposure to UHF radio waves and is one of the big reasons our first cell phones had to have their wattage lowered. There is no actual definitive proof behind this claim but there must be a reason for this.
As always keep up the good posts my friend.
Peace,
The Last Sage
On a side note, if you would like to resteem that post response I sent you, I reposted it as a blog on my page.
You know I don't even own a cell phone? Many reasons but this is one. I read a post from an article from a doctor a while back in which the doctor noticed he was treating more patients for cancer around the groin area. He started to track the patients and noticed most of them carried cell phones on their hip or in their pocket. This was the first day i began to realize this technology could be destructive.
I have read about GPS technology developed for this same purpose. My concern with that technology is satellites cost quite a bit of money to deploy and who wants to rely on a technology that is so government/business dependent? Also, messages received seem to be location dependent. However, Qualcomm's have the ability to receive messages on the move, so I don't know why it could not be adapted for phones too.
Do all radio frequencies cause this damage? I have often wondered about HAMM Radio signals for cell phone technology like this. I need to look into how the data is carried and if using Continuos Waveform is even feasible for carrying picture and text data.