Larken says "religion isn't the problem, the cult of government is" to which you said:
So far the most horrific dids in human history, the greatest genocides, the most cruel enslavements, the harshest tyrannies were not really related to religions. So I don't know if religion is the thing we must worry about most.
So it doesn't mean anything if you excused religious atrocities by claiming religion had nothing to do with past atrocities when it clearly and most certainly did, just as it doesn't mean anything when you made your very first comment saying that nonsense and alluding that the article made a case about religion being bad, but now you can allude that you're not guilty of blaming human nature. LMAO.