Where did you form that from? I read this:
So far the most horrific dids in human history, the greatest genocides, the most cruel enslavements, the harshest tyrannies were not really realted to religions. So I don't know if religion is the thing we must worry about most.
Keep saying that, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pott weren't religious and their atrocities have nothing to do with religion. The blame? All extremism is the same? How are all extremes the same as religious extremism? Aren't you the one who's writing these "how to jurnalism" so to that I say fuck off, you want to know what my point is you hack job? What the fuck was your point with religion is not the problem? Didn't bother to read the article to realize it has nothing to do with "religion is the problem"?
You clearly didn't take the the time to understand my first reply to your comment. That you are clearly in the lost as to what the article was about when you remark that religion isn't to blame, as if there is one mention or a hint that religion itself was to blame, or that the article painted religion in a shady way, as is obvious to everyone else I assume. In that comment I said, tying your redundant remark back into the discussion at hand:
"governments" deeply entwined in actual religion, which has never really escaped the influence of religion.
and at the end there is a link, if you would have noticed it..