The DAO Hard Fork, and the Negotiation that Couldn’t Happen

in #the8 years ago (edited)

 



I want it to be clear that I am not speaking on the behalf of the Ethereum Foundation. The point of this post is not to address the handling of the DAO fork, but to share why I believe the hard fork is the right choice.

Why we should reverse the DAO heist

The Ethereum community should reverse the DAO heist, and return the ether invested to the DAO token holders (and the extraBalance to the DAO token purchasers) in order to mitigate negative externalities of the DAO heist.

“an externality is the cost or benefit that affects a party who did not choose to incur that cost or benefit.” — Wikipedia

I am thinking, for example, about externalities arising from legal and regulatory precedents.

Why a hard fork is the only reasonable way to reverse the heist

The soft fork failed, and the counterattack is not very promising

A soft fork that censors DAO attackers was attempted, but it was discovered to have a fundamental DoS vulnerability before it was triggered.Without a soft fork, the counterattack effort is not at all guaranteed to succeed.

The complication of negotiation

Negotiating is the optimal solution, if it leads to nearly all of the funds being returned. A counterattack that potentially leads to the funds moving back and forth forever could let us negotiate for the return of only some of the funds. Without a fork, therefore, we are not in a good place to negotiate with the attacker. Given that the soft fork has failed, only the credible possibility of a hard fork can put us in a strong position.Negotiating with the attacker(s?) is complicated somewhat by multiple otherattacks, which possibly are conducted by different attackers. While at least some of them may be willing to negotiate, any negotiation that leads to the return of funds will take at a long time.




Refer : https://medium.com/@Vlad_Zamfir/the-dao-hard-fork-and-the-negotiation-that-couldnt-happen-bdd2aedefe84#.o2bfitgye

Sort:  

Please try to refrain from copying the entire article to Steemit. Even though you've linked the source, it does them little good since you've copypasta'd their entire article. This is also considered plagiarism and can end up in a DMCA notice being sent. You may also be downvoted and added to the downvote bot's list if your account does this repeatedly.

If you don't mind, please edit your above post to only include a few sentences from the article.

The downvote will be removed if you make the edit and notify #postitabuse on Slack or with a mention here on Steemit, if done in time.

Thank you for your cooperation!

TF

@dantheman This post is a copypasta. Please consider removing your upvote. Thanks!

Let's see what miners do. The attacker have millions to give away and already said miners running his fork (old client) will get rewarded. Interesting things are going on @ this moment.

Edit: it just happend

Agree - hard fork imminent @cooper10510

Sorry, next time Will not happen again #postitabuse
The new rules will be studied again

My friend losed 4$ by panic time, you don´t follow me friend, keep calm, remember, it is cryptocoins, all time up and down :D. unless you rise much and you can not buy back:

I'm trying to learn more about this topic and your insight was helpful, thanks for your perspective

I see why they did it, but I think it sets a bad precedent for future code negotiations.

I agree on the revert.

I wasnt happy with what was happening with eth so i got out while all this crap goes on.

Speaking Excellent