We sometimes get advice that "Listen to the child's remarks, they may tell the truth.".
Certainly, as children have no prejudice, I think that there is a case to tell the essence of things.
Looking only at this phenomenon, it seems that children are leading the same conclusion as the saints.
However, it is obvious that even if the conclusion between them is the same, the process leading to them is different.
Children CAN NOT have prejudice.
They can do powerful hypothesis thinking because they have little knowledge or experience.
Meanwhile, the genius erases their own knowledge and experience, and puts up thinking from nothing.
It is self-evident which is an advanced process.
We should not think that "the answers are the same, so that all the speakers are equally amazing."
It is possible that the answer of a person who thought deeply and the answer of a person of a shallow idea are the same.
From a long-term perspective, there is no doubt that a person with deep thought is a person who makes more useful remarks.
It does not mean "treat children as nasty".
It means not focusing on the answer but the process leading to it.
SAONARA.