People offering social media assistants service on a web3 platform like Hive is interesting, especially considering that these services are more common in web2 platforms. This raises the question: Do users think Hive as operating at the same level as mainstream social applications?
While one might assume so, I believe our platform is still unique compared to web2 social media apps. This uniqueness is because we don’t have manipulative algorithms that can be gamed. Instead, the platform's dynamics are because it’s driven by the behaviors of creators and curators.
From my observations, the most effective approach is to focus on creating content that:
- You genuinely enjoy
- Appeals to potential curators
- Aligns with specific community preferences
On Hive, there are many Communities that has substantial voting power to reward content with decent $$ that matches their interests. For content creators, it's important to explore and understand these Communities, identifying those that appeals with their content style.
Another critical factor for success is maintaining consistent, authentic interaction within the community. As many successful Hive users emphasize, "Engagement is King". A principle I also believe in. While seeing good results may require months or even years of dedicated participation, the long-term rewards make it worthwhile.
The platform rewards genuine connection, creativity, and persistent community involvement, setting it apart from traditional social media ecosystems. I don’t think that it’s easy to game if it’s “gameable” at all.
I listened to the whole content of your post but I’m just sharing my thoughts about the points that you mentioned in the earlier part of your post. I haven’t fully digested the later part✌🏽