Was irrelevant because America has too many guns right now anyway.
Thats what makes them cheap.
- Availability
- Ease of moving them across US
- Quantity
- Ease of acquiring.
I would think thats the whole point of the ban and regulation. To CHANGE the fact that the US has too many guns.
I mean people for regulation and bans say that by making those adjustments there would be less guns and less gun violence, mass shootings, what ever and your answer is basically:
You cant have less guns because the US has a lot of guns.
Lol. And you have the gal to pound your chest and call yourself a "victor" in the convo with the girl there.
Give me a break.
Posted using Partiko Android
You would need to do it by force. It would be a civil war easily. That's the problem. Listen to me, its never going to happen and the difference it would make if everyone did give them up would be a net negative anyway. Gun crime would be largely the same, mass shootings would be the same. Home invasions would sky rocket. other kinds of crime would increase dramatically. Its suggesting we go into civil war for no reason.