Top Ten Discoveries that Sparked Questions of ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Conspiracy’ Against the 9/11 Attack

in #top107 years ago

Screenshot_20180223-181319.jpg
A bad day with loads of horrible things to remember, but a lot of scenes with unending controversy, suspicions and questions. A terrorist group may have come bold to claim the day and the attack, but they wouldn’t have been successful in a security conscious land like America. Could it be real or not? These have sparked unending questions in the events that rocked the incidence. Here are a few things that needs questioning or perhaps some more investigations;
Screenshot_20180228-224831.jpg
Ben Sliney who happened to be the chief of air-traffic-control operations at the FAA’s command of Herndon, Virginia, gave an unprecedented order to ground 4,000-plus planes across the nation and redirect any aircraft in the sky to the nearest airport. There wouldn’t have been any suspicion about this act if it wasn’t his first day on the job, and if the attack didn’t follow. Questions have been asked if he knew of the attack beforehand to have given such order. Such queries are logical I think.
Screenshot_20180228-224815.jpg
The many people that have cried about the 9/11 attack being a conspiracy may have found another viable point here. This makes it seem really planned for such that most people will argue that the person to cover the event has been sent on the moon earlier. Don’t be deceived by my theme, he wasn’t missing, he was just absent on earth and in the moon. Guess what? He was the only American missing in the planet then. I am referring to astronaut Frank L. Culberston, who recorded the event from the ISS. Another suspicion trailed his discovery afterwards. The pilot of the plane that struck The Pentagon was Charles Burlingame, a classmate of his from the US Naval Academy. Would we call this a coincidence?
Screenshot_20180228-224759.jpg
What do we make of this? Is the law blind? I thought the incidence was reported as a terrorist attack. How come the American Airline and not U.S security forces are at the end of the negligence blame if there had been signs the act of terror would be manifest? I asked all these questions because an investment bank which lost 75% of its employees in 9/11 sued American Airlines for negligence in allowing terrorists on board, and won $135 million. Do you smell rat too?
Screenshot_20180228-224736.jpg
I won’t join the multitude to believe the ones questioning this act of love extended by Canadian government to hundreds or perhaps thousands of people are against international cooperation against terrorism. I think this should be considered from the angle that something may have been prepared for. To get over 225 flights aircrafts diverted to Canada in the name of Operation Yellow Ribbon in response to the September 11 attacks is no joke. On top of these, all the passengers were fed. Great extension of love but what about preplans.
Screenshot_20180228-224717.jpg
A person that claimed to have been present in the WTC building was eventually discovered to have faked her presence. I am referring to Tania Head, a well-known 9/11 survivor who faked being in the South Tower during the attacks, and ended up serving as President of The WTC Survivors Network. It was later discovered that she was lying. She was not even on the turf of the United States during the attacks. Could this be desperation for fame or some sponsored acting?
Screenshot_20180228-224656.jpg
This is another indication that some people may have gotten valid feelers that an attack would be launched on that popular date and on the popular buildings. The company in possession of the World Trade Center had scheduled a meeting for the attack date specifically on the 88th floor of the first tower to discuss what to do in the event of a terrorist attack, but they unprecedentedly rescheduled the meeting that night that precede the attack because a supposed member of the meeting was absent. Is this another coincidence or a calculated safety? I think there is a point to trail here only if I belong to the FBI.
Screenshot_20180228-224556.jpg
The pictured man was popular for his strong words against Islam of violence. He has a lasting history of violence resistance and advocacy for religion of tolerance. He fought against the Soviets in the 1980s, was also against a fundamentalist interpretation of Islam. Guess what? He was assassinated two days before 9/11, after warning of a major terrorist attack set to happen in the United States. He definitely knew something. What do you think too?
Screenshot_20180228-224524.jpg
It appears some people have resolved to make 11th of September 2001 popular for evil. On the day of the 9/11 attack after the first plane had hit the North Tower, people in the South Tower wanted to leave the tower but they were advised by an announcement to stay at their desks. Even those who tried to leave forcefully were turned back by security in the building before the exits. Guess what? About 1,120 of them died in that tower. Isn’t this suspicious?
Screenshot_20180228-224459.jpg
Hmm. One minute silence for the hero. His name went down in history for having the love of the people at heart but he couldn’t survive the incidence. On the attack date, Officer John Perry was at police headquarters filing his retirement papers when he got notified about the first airplane hitting the North Tower of the WTC. He made it back to the scene to assist with rescue operations and was killed when one of the towers collapsed. And most surprisingly, he was the only off-duty officer killed on 9/11. Was it that the on-duty officers have been slated for death??? And could it be that John Perrys good heart got him unwarranted death?
Some striking questions here right?
Are these questions not worth being asked? Tell us something in the comment below

Sort:  

Add these to the multitude of other questions surrounding 911. Im beyond being amazed at the number of sheeple that scream at the top of their lungs covering their ears like a child when these inconsistencies appear in front of them. Great post