This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform and is by no means a judgement as to the quality of this post.
This is a quote from the @transparencybot comment. Can you tell me where is guilt torture??
This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform and is by no means a judgement as to the quality of this post.
This is a quote from the @transparencybot comment. Can you tell me where is guilt torture??
Because he did so in every trendy post i've seen, which seems accusatory...
Every post you saw it on bought its place on the trending list.
We didnt vote it there it took its rewards by paying a thug bot to steal from everybody else
Understood. However, what i mean to say is that user posted his comment in every post to warn all people that the author of the post used some bot to make it trendy, which for me has no sense at all...
Why warn?? It was just an information. Do you think censoring this information is better?
Waity, waity, waity...
I didn't say that the info must be censored. I've just said it isn't necessary at all. It is considered a warn because biding bots is not well seen for some people who thinks using that service is for the losers or non-populars. Biding bots -and pay huge amounts to promote your posts- is necesary to gain presence on Steemit like it or not...
True.
I didn't mind TB itself all that much but it provokes trolls who have no interest in understanding the economics of the system, but just want to go off on people who buy votes.