How were his comments judgemental?
This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform and is by no means a judgement as to the quality of this post.
???
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How were his comments judgemental?
This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform and is by no means a judgement as to the quality of this post.
???
He is 100% against bidbots. He rewards people using the tag nobidbots. Have you even read and understood the context of your quote?
You didn't answer my question.
So we're censoring people because of their personal views? Steem has a bright future for sure...
How dare he!??!!! This clearly makes huge harm to steem ecosystem!!!
I did answer your question. You are too obtuse to understand my answer.
Okay, once again:
Please show me the judgemental part in this quote.
Or let's see the whole @transparencybot comment:
Example:
This post has received votes totaling more than $50.00 from the following pay for vote services:
appreciator upvote in the amount of $116.25 STU, $145.59 USD.
rocky1 upvote in the amount of $85.97 STU, $107.67 USD.
upme upvote in the amount of $80.02 STU, $100.22 USD.
buildawhale upvote in the amount of $60.79 STU, $76.14 USD.
therising upvote in the amount of $44.26 STU, $55.43 USD.
For a total calculated value of $387 STU, $485 USD before curation, with a calculated curation of $97 USD.
This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform and is by no means a judgement as to the quality of this post.
Show me the judgemental part.
And suddenly there was stillness all over the place....
Devil's advocate here: Well, in this case I decide to repost my very same article every 5 minutes, my freely chosen form of promotion. I hope you don't dare shaming me for my free choice. You could simply mute me, but please don't comment on my repetitive posting. (No I'm not going to do this, just consider this a provocative thought experiment)