RE: Help me to make CTPSB better - Brainstorming

I like the price stability of CTPSB and slow-growth model. If a diesel pool (as much as I like them) would make it more volatile and jeopardize the slow-growth model, I probably wouldn't be a big fan.

I don't mind the name, but like someone else said, I understand it could be a problem in attracting new investors, so a rebranding could be useful.

As for making CTPSP part of Liotes, it depends on what you have in mind and what would that entail. Would that just mean co-managing with Zoltan of the existing (possibly "upgraded" project), or a major restructuring, where CTPSP funds slowly move into a part of Liotes, and holders of CTPSB receive an airdrop of LEN or LENM as compensation? I would prefer the project to remain with a distinct identity, separately or within the Liotes project.

I like the price stability of CTPSB and slow-growth model. If a diesel pool (as much as I like them) would make it more volatile and jeopardize the slow-growth model, I probably wouldn't be a big fan.

The whole concept should make sure that the price of the token follows it's value in spite of the liquidity pool. That's a challenge but I believe it would be possible to continue on the same track like CTPSB.

Would that just mean co-managing with Zoltan
Yes, the idea is not to put everything upside down but to make sure that there is not only one person who has the keys to the accounts :-)

I would prefer the project to remain with a distinct identity, separately or within the Liotes project.

That's also the idea that I have in mind.

Thanks a lot for the very useful feed-back!