Stefan seems to believe that the road to freedom will be a multi-generational one, which seems to serve as a rather convenient excuse in this particular instance. Since it would seem he sincerely doesn't believe it's possible to achieve a stateless society within our lifetimes, one could suppose that the vision he has for the future stateless society is just that, a dream, and has nothing to do with his real principles.
Most of us are likely guilty of the same crime, to some extent or another. We all understand that the state is inherently and irredeemably immoral, but we all support it through our payment of taxes, even if it is taken from us forcibly, our support is garnered just the same. All we're left with is the moral right to bitch about it and call the state for the theif that it is. They've still got all the fucking guns.
Personally, I think our only shot at getting rid of the state for good is getting rid of the very idea of the state UNIVERSALLY, because at the end of the day, that's all the state really is, an idea. A dream, and it too, has nothing to do with actual principles. If we can't accomplish that in one generation, we'll likely never accomplish it at all. The state has the deck stacked too high against us. They control the youth and as long as they have that much influence over the minds of the young lasting change cannot be achieved. We have to convince EVERYONE that the state is unnecessary and can never be anything but an organized crime network. If we can't get everyone on the same page, we're fucked. The rate of indoctrination is just too high and the numbers of reasonable people is just too low.
Actually, when even a significant minority of the population is voluntaryist, the state is doomed. In the U.S., for example, if a mere 10% (over 30,000,000 people) just didn't cooperate with the statist BS, the thing would collapse, regardless of how much the other 90% love their enslavement.
How do you figure?