Nowhere did I suggest such. I said if OP makes a good argument, [s]he is entitled to a good counter-argument, not some wishy-washy wiki [s]he probably already knows in- and outward.
OP made a specific claim of evidence, which can easily be addressed, falsified or verified in experiment. A roundabout dismissal with an argument from incredulity doesn't do it justice, that is all.
I took a different claim of evidence for flat earth and "debunked" it thusly:
rationalwiki, I beg you, have you even seen their page on 9/11? These people would deny the Illuminati while chewing a golden apple!
Then why point out that it was "not addressed to me" at all?
And sure, you put together a nice post... But I don't have your skills with blender, or even know what it is.
I had tried to simply overlay a line across the horizon to show how it curved, but it was hard to see with the horizon blending into the water...