There are a ton of cooking shows out there. So many in-fact that I believe most of them get old pretty fast. I mean, there is an entire network that exists purely for this reason. Therefore, I think it is a bit understandable how it might be a little bit difficult to make an impact in this industry and to do anything original.
source
What sets Chef's Table apart from other cooking shows is that they focus on the individual person (the chef in question)'s life far more than they do the food they are creating. Most of the people they focus on are relatively unknown (I am sure they are famous somewhere, but I don't know who they are) and from the 2 episodes I watched normally their upbringing is quite humble. Both seemed to be lower to middle-class families.
source
The first one I watched was about Mashama Bailey, a woman who came from modest roots, but due to the hard-working nature of her parents was able to go to college only to end up doing what a lot of people in college do: Study just whatever despite the fact that they have no real interest in the career that said degree is meant to be preparing them for. She ends up doing a job that she doesn't really like immediately after college and gets fired.... As it turns out losing that job was one of the best things that ever happened to her because it "kicked her in the butt" to go in the culinary trade.
While I can get behind these stories I feel as though the directors of these things are kind of trying to paint a more tragic story than might actually be the case. I suppose good TV needs some sensationalism but I kind of found myself getting a bit bored as they created one tragic trial after the other. It all ends well because Mashama ended up studying in France and later landing a job where she was a partner back in her birth state of Georgia - and ended up right back where she wanted to be.
Overall, i think this show is worth a look but I was a little disappointed and got bored with the constant build up of the"please feel sorry for these people!" narrative they were pushing. I suppose this could be a plus for some people and I can admire the attempt at taking a different direction in a market that is saturated with every nuance of cooking that can be imagined.
I don't think I will watch this show anymore, but for anyone out there that wants to see a chef show with a different spin than is expected for the most part, this could be for you. I found it to be a little too focused on tragedy for my taste and each hour-long episode could have easily been 30 minutes- that probably would have fixed it for me.
on a scale of "Urgh!" to "Wowsers!" I give Chef's Table a rating of....
source
Well the fact that they concentrated on the actors rather than the food may just be the selling point, but from what you narrated, the theme seems like a typical rag to riches plot really, and I think we've past these kinda stories really. Anyway story still had a selling point lol.
yeah, it isn't bad. I just feel like when we have access to thousands of other shows that this one will be put on the back burner (pun intended)
Hahahaha pun well noted
Watched half an episode as my daughter was watching it. Not something that said to me is a must watch and kind of dodge it whilst going through the Netflix menu these days. Meh is spot on.
Lol you're right. This is one of those shows I get to watch courtesy of my wife. In defense of the show, they used to tell some very interesting stories about the lives of certain chefs. I think they had the guy from Patagonia who cooks almost exclusively with fire. His fresh trout caught out of the lake looked famishing. 👍
This indeed make a difference, a lot of chef show only focus on some nice food cooked by celebrities and nothing more, most of them follow these pattern, it's surprising and amazing to see a stand out concept of this kind in that industry. So, they deserve some kudos
I don't like it taking time as well, I love things straight to the point, so I can relate with your disappointment about the show. But, their concept seems nice to me.