Here's my opinion on why I don't like Twitter news:
Because Twitter quietly blocks news that might contradict US policy doctrine, news that might cast a shadow or "bleed - the truth" on what might actually be going on will be deleted under some kind of rule. So I don't find twitter to be an "adequate" news source, because how will you judge the situation if you only read about one side of the conflict and don't read news from the other side, in this case the news from the russian side. In fact, we can say that it is the same as the children of the Nazis in WWII believed that they were invaded and not they were the invaders.
This example is of course very crude, but I think my point is clear
Just draw logical conclusions, not conclusions based on morality
In the news wrote for example "100500 million civilians killed" - and now you wonder who benefits from it and why?
Why is there no proof of deaths, just photos that are easier to fake?
I just don't understand the logic: "You read the news about how awful Russia is, and now you're convinced because of this news that it is."
the logic of thinking is like a child's, do not question what you get in the form of information
Congratulations @polyushka! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
Your next target is to reach 2750 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPSupport the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!