Keep being awsome @scipio, alternatives to evaluate quality are always welcomed, and since we cant expect steemit Inc to care about these "minor" features, this is a great addition to the community.
But, i have some questioning to do here:
Shouldnt all users scores be public? After all we are talking about a public blockchain, and transparency is always good.
Will the witness be curated and recieve votes by the ua curating bot? This is Just a personal opinion, but If we are talking about better rewards distribution, witness get a big advantage, and since they are already being rewarded for being a witness (and having a big stack) wouldnt they get an even bigger slice of the pie?
Please keep in mind not to confuse 3 things:
-1- UA, the Reputation / Influence metric
-2- @steem-ua, our own algorithmic curation service
-3- UA-API, broadcasting UA data to UA Registered Partners