I didn't promote that the natives should be Aggressors against the Queen I asked how can you trust the Queen/Crown/Government to help them if the crown itself has proven to be only a Aggressor. To my understanding Protector and Aggressor are mutually exclusive, as are Friend and Enemy. The crown's Deeds throughout history expose the crown as Aggressor and even more so a Predator indeed, the people don't need to declare War against this wanton abuser, they need to denounce it's deeds and acts, they need to denounce it's legitimacy and evidence it with the long trail of abuse they suffered. Weak or not you're saying that they shouldn't dare to speak up or face the fox, and equate doing something extraordinary to live to not facing the Queen, because you are weak and they are strong? The testament of strength is exactly what one does when they are weakest, and the testament of weakness is exactly what one displays when they are strongest. The crown shows that it knows almost exclusively only coercion, deceit and aggression, displaying the character of an Abuser, they are weak, all they can do is hurl rocks, lie and cheat, their strength is what most consider weakness indeed.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: